On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 6:40 AM Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> wrote: > Ants and Andres suggested to replace the spinlock used in pgss_store() with > LWLock. I agreed with them and posted the POC patch doing that. But I think > the patch is an item for v14. The patch may address the reported performance > issue, but may cause other performance issues in other workloads. We would > need to measure how the patch affects the performance in various workloads. > It seems too late to do that at this stage of v13. Thought?
I agree that it's too late for v13. Thanks -- Peter Geoghegan