On Wed, 2020-06-24 at 12:31 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> nodeAgg.c already treats those separately:
>
> void
> hash_agg_set_limits(double hashentrysize, uint64 input_groups, int
> used_bits,
> Size *mem_limit, uint64
> *ngroups_limit,
> int *num_partitions)
> {
> int npartitions;
> Size partition_mem;
>
> /* if not expected to spill, use all of work_mem */
> if (input_groups * hashentrysize < work_mem * 1024L)
> {
> if (num_partitions != NULL)
> *num_partitions = 0;
> *mem_limit = work_mem * 1024L;
> *ngroups_limit = *mem_limit / hashentrysize;
> return;
> }
The reason this code exists is to decide how much of work_mem to set
aside for spilling (each spill partition needs an IO buffer).
The alternative would be to fix the number of partitions before
processing a batch, which didn't seem ideal. Or, we could just ignore
the memory required for IO buffers, like HashJoin.
Granted, this is an example where an underestimate can give an
advantage, but I don't think we want to extend the concept into other
areas.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
