On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 4:53 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > There are two cases where these two columns are not the same:
>
> >      hindi       english     \
> >      russian     english     \
>
> > The second one is old; the first one I added using the second one as
> > example.  But I wonder what the rationale for this is.  Maybe for hindi
> > one could make some kind of cultural argument, but for russian this
> > seems entirely arbitrary.
>
> Perhaps it is, but we have actual Russians who think it's a good idea.
> I recall questioning that point some years ago, and Oleg replied that
> they'd done that intentionally because (a) technical Russian uses a lot
> of English words, and (b) it's easy to tell which is which thanks to
> the disjoint letter sets.
>
>
Yes, you are right.


> Whether the same is true for Hindi, I have no idea.
>
> > Moreover, AFAIK, the following other languages do not use Latin-based
> > alphabets:
>
> >      arabic      arabic      \
> >      greek       greek       \
> >      nepali      nepali      \
> >      tamil       tamil       \
>
> Hmm.  I think all of those entries are ones that got added by me while
> absorbing post-2007 Snowball updates, and I confess that I did not think
> about this point.  Maybe these should be changed.
>
>                         regards, tom lane
>
>
>

-- 
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

Reply via email to