On Tue, Jun 9, 2020 at 3:23 PM Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > ISTM that it'd be pretty broken if it could happen. We cannot have two > different parts of the system send messages to the client > independently. The protocol is pretty stateful...
There's a difference between building messages concurrently and sending them concurrently. > Set a boolean and assert out if one already is in progress? We'd need > some state to know where to reset the position to on error anyway. Sure, that's basically just different notation for the same thing. I might prefer my notation over yours, but you might prefer the reverse. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
