Hi,

We currently have
 *      bool SpinLockFree(slock_t *lock)
 *              Tests if the lock is free. Returns true if free, false if 
locked.
 *              This does *not* change the state of the lock.
and its underlying S_LOCK_FREE() operation:
 *
 *      bool S_LOCK_FREE(slock_t *lock)
 *              Tests if the lock is free. Returns true if free, false if 
locked.
 *              This does *not* change the state of the lock.

They are currently unused and, as far as I can tell, have never been
used outside test code /asserts. We also don't currently implement them
in the spinlock fallback code:

bool
s_lock_free_sema(volatile slock_t *lock)
{
        /* We don't currently use S_LOCK_FREE anyway */
        elog(ERROR, "spin.c does not support S_LOCK_FREE()");
        return false;
}


I also find the "free" in the name very confusing. Everytime I look at
them (which, I grant, is not that often), I have to think about what
they mean.

Thus: Let's just remove SpinLockFree() / S_LOCK_FREE()?

Greetings,

Andres Freund


Reply via email to