Thomas Munro <thomas.mu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:00 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> ... Unfortunately it seems there's nothing
>> equivalent for POSIX shmem, so (2) is possible. See
> Ah, I see. Ok, I propose we update the example symptom to (2), and
> back-patch to 10. See attached.
+1, except s/attemping/attempting/
>> Relevant to the current discussion: this creates a possible positive
>> reason for setting dynamic_shared_memory_type to "sysv", namely if it's
>> the best available way to get around RemoveIPC in a particular situation.
>> Should we document that?
> Doesn't seem worth the trouble, especially since the real solution is
> to tell systemd to back off by one of the two methods described.
Agreed.
regards, tom lane
