Le mer. 3 juin 2020 à 04:16, David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> a écrit :
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 09:28:48PM +0200, Vik Fearing wrote: > > On 6/2/20 7:54 PM, David G. Johnston wrote: > > > At this point, given the original goal of the patch was to try and > > > grease a smoother path to changing the default for BUFFERS, and > > > that people seem OK with doing just that without having this > > > patch, I'd say we should just change the default and forget this > > > patch. There hasn't been any other demand from our users for this > > > capability and I also doubt that having BUFFERS on by default is > > > going to bother people. > > > > What about WAL? Can we turn that one one by default, too? > > > > I often find having VERBOSE on helps when people don't qualify their > > columns and I don't know the schema. We should turn that on by > > default, as well. > > +1 for all on (except ANALYZE because it would be a foot cannon) by > default. For those few to whom it really matters, there'd be OFF > switches. > > +1 for all on, except ANALYZE (foot cannon as David says) and VERBOSE (verbose is something you ask for when the usual display isn't enough). -1 for GUCs, we already have too many of them. -- Guillaume.
