On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 02:45:11PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Honestly, I think we've spent plenty of time on this already. I don't > see a problem with each module having its own certificate(s) - that > makes them more self-contained - nor any great need to have the targets > named the same.
Yeah, I don't see much point in combining both of them as those modules have different assumptions behind the files built. Now I agree with Peter's point to use the same Makefile rule names in both files so as it gets easier to grep for all instances. So, src/test/ssl/ being the oldest one, ssl_passphrase_callback should just do s/ssl-files/sslfiles/. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
