On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 07:49:45AM -0700, Jesse Zhang wrote: > For bystanders: Andres and I argued for "fixing this sooner and > backpatch" and Michael suggested "wait longer and whack all moles". We > have waited, and there seems to be only one mole (finding all dead > unbroken "include"s was left as an exercise for the reader). Have we > come to an agreement on this?
If Andres could take care of this issue as he feels is suited, that's OK for me. I could look at that and play with llvm builds. Now I am not really familiar with it, so it would take me some time but we are all here to learn :) Please note that I would still wait for their next GA release to plug in any extra holes at the same time. @Jesse: or is this change actually part of the upcoming 10.0.1? -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
