On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 17:06, David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > For the patch. I know you just put it together quickly, but I don't > think you can do that ramp up the way you have. It looks like there's > a risk of torn reads and torn writes and I'm unsure how much that > could affect the test results here.
Oops. On closer inspection, I see that memory is per worker, not global to the scan.
