On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 4:25 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:48:59PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Still not sure that's worth bothering. So, let's wait a couple of > > days first to see if anybody has any comments, though I'd like to just > > go with the simplest solution at hand and remove only the duplicated > > comment about the standalone business with event triggers. > > I have gone through this one again this morning, and applied the > simple version as merging the checks on the current event trigger > state would make us lose some context about why each event gets > skipped. > > Ok. Thanks! David J.
