Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota....@gmail.com> writes:
> AFAICS it is right and the change suggested looks reasonable to me.
> One arguable point might be whether it is right that SlruData holds
> pgstats internal index from the standpoint of modularity. (It is one
> of the reasons I didn't propose a patch for that..)
Yeah, this is a fair point. On the other hand, the existing code has
pgstat.c digging into the SLRU control structure, which is as bad or
worse a modularity violation. Perhaps we could ditch that by having
slru.c obtain and store the integer index which it then passes to
the pgstat.c counter routines, rather than passing a SlruCtl pointer.
I'll have to look at whether 28cac71bd exposed a data structure that
was formerly private, but if it did I'd be VERY strongly inclined
to revert that.
regards, tom lane
