I would appreciate opinions from the patch authors on this ordering
change (rationale in previous email).  I forgot to CC Sergei and Nikita.

> diff --git a/src/bin/psql/describe.c b/src/bin/psql/describe.c
> index 8dca6d8bb4..9bd0bf8356 100644
> --- a/src/bin/psql/describe.c
> +++ b/src/bin/psql/describe.c
> @@ -6288,7 +6288,11 @@ listOpFamilyOperators(const char 
> *access_method_pattern,
>               processSQLNamePattern(pset.db, &buf, family_pattern, 
> have_where, false,
>                                                         "nsf.nspname", 
> "of.opfname", NULL, NULL);
>  
> -     appendPQExpBufferStr(&buf, "ORDER BY 1, 2, o.amopstrategy, 3;");
> +     appendPQExpBufferStr(&buf, "ORDER BY 1, 2,\n"
> +                                              "  o.amoplefttype = 
> o.amoprighttype DESC,\n"
> +                                              "  
> pg_catalog.format_type(o.amoplefttype, NULL),\n"
> +                                              "  
> pg_catalog.format_type(o.amoprighttype, NULL),\n"
> +                                              "  o.amopstrategy;");
>  
>       res = PSQLexec(buf.data);
>       termPQExpBuffer(&buf);


-- 
Álvaro Herrera                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


Reply via email to