On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:07:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > I like your wording, but the "that encoding" wasn't clear enough for me, > > so I reworded it to: > > > Allow Unicode escapes, e.g., E'\u####', U&'\####', to represent any > > character available in the database encoding, even when the database > > encoding is not UTF-8 (Tom Lane) > > How about "to be used for" instead of "to represent"? "Represent" kind > of sounds like we're using these on output, which we aren't.
Uh, I think "used for" is worse though, since we are not using it. I don't get the "output" feel of the word at all. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
