On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 01:45:37PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > | This is controlled by GUC wal_skip_threshold. > > > > > I think you should say that's a size threshold which determines which > > > > > strategy > > > > > to use (WAL or fsync). > > > > > > > > I went with: > > > > The WAL write amount where this happens is controlled by > > > > wal_skip_threshold. > > > > > > > > They can use the doc link if they want more detail. > > > > > > I guess I would say "relations larger than wal_skip_threshold will be > > > fsynced > > > rather than copied to WAL" > > > > How is this? > > > > Relations larger than wal_skip_threshold will have their files fynsced > > rather than writing their WAL records. > > I see I was too late, but: > > Fix typo (fynsc) and maybe add parens().
Ah, I was looking for fsync to fix that and could not find it. Now I found it with that spelling, I ended up using "fsync'ed". -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
