On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 9:18 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:05 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 7:38 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 1:22 PM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I agree with that definition. I can send a cleanup patch if there's > > > > no objection. > > > > > > > > > > Okay, feel free to send the patch. Thanks for taking the initiative > > > to write a patch for this. > > > > > > > Julien, are you planning to write a cleanup patch for this open item? > > Sorry Amit, I've been quite busy at work for the last couple of days. > I'll take care of that this morning for sure!
Here's the patch. I included the content of v3-fix_explain_wal_output.patch you provided before, and tried to consistently replace full page writes/fpw to full page images/fpi everywhere on top of it (so documentation, command output, variable names and comments).
v4-fix_wal_usage.diff
Description: Binary data
