On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:29:54PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > Yeah, but that's not documented. So I don't think that we need to keep > the backward-compatibility for that. > > Also in that case, non-fast promotion is triggered. Since my patch > tries to remove non-fast promotion, it's intentional to prevent them > from doing that. But you think that we should not drop that because > there are still some users for that?
It would be good to ask around to folks maintaining HA solutions about that change at least, as there could be a point in still letting promotion to happen in this case, but switch silently to the fast path. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
