On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 10:44:42AM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:16 PM Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > > > Also, this part still doesn't read well: > > > > - * amvacuumcleanup to the DSM segment if it's the first time to get > > it? > > - * from them? because they? allocate it locally and it's possible > > that an > > - * index will be vacuumed by the different vacuum process at the > > next > > > > If you change "it" and "them" and "it" and say "*a* different", then it'll > > be > > ok. > > > > I am not sure if I follow how exactly you want to change it but still > let me know what you think about if we change it like: "Copy the index > bulk-deletion result returned from ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup to > the DSM segment if it's the first time because they allocate locally > and it's possible that an index will be vacuumed by the different > vacuum process at the next time."
I changed "the" to "a" and removed "at": |Copy the index |bulk-deletion result returned from ambulkdelete and amvacuumcleanup to |the DSM segment if it's the first time [???] because they allocate locally |and it's possible that an index will be vacuumed by a different |vacuum process the next time." Is it correct to say: "..if it's the first iteration" and "different process on the next iteration" ? Or "cycle" ? -- Justin
