On Sat, 11 Apr 2020 at 09:00, Teja Mupparti <tejesw...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Andres and Kyotaro for the quick review. I have fixed the typos and
> also included the critical section (emulated it with try-catch block since
> palloc()s are causing issues in the truncate code). This time I used git
> format-patch.
>
I briefly looked at the latest patch but I'm not sure it's the right
thing here to use PG_TRY/PG_CATCH to report the PANIC error. For
example, with the following code you changed, we will always end up
with emitting a PANIC "failed to truncate the relation" regardless of
the actual cause of the error.
+ PG_CATCH();
+ {
+ ereport(PANIC, (errcode(ERRCODE_INTERNAL_ERROR),
+ errmsg("failed to truncate the relation")));
+ }
+ PG_END_TRY();
And the comments of RelationTruncate() mentions:
/*
* We WAL-log the truncation before actually truncating, which means
* trouble if the truncation fails. If we then crash, the WAL replay
* likely isn't going to succeed in the truncation either, and cause a
* PANIC. It's tempting to put a critical section here, but that cure
* would be worse than the disease. It would turn a usually harmless
* failure to truncate, that might spell trouble at WAL replay, into a
* certain PANIC.
*/
As a second idea, I wonder if we can defer truncation until commit
time like smgrDoPendingDeletes mechanism. The sequence would be:
At RelationTruncate(),
1. WAL logging.
2. Remember buffers to be dropped.
At CommitTransaction(),
3. Revisit the remembered buffers to check if the buffer still has
table data that needs to be truncated.
4-a, If it has, we mark it as IO_IN_PROGRESS.
4-b, If it already has different table data, ignore it.
5, Truncate physical files.
6, Mark the buffer we marked at #4-a as invalid.
If an error occurs between #3 and #6 or in abort case, we revert all
IO_IN_PROGRESS flags on the buffers.
In the above idea, remembering all buffers having to-be-truncated
table at RelationTruncate(), we reduce the time for checking buffers
at the commit time. Since we acquire AccessExclusiveLock the number of
buffers having to-be-truncated table's data never increases. A
downside would be that since we can truncate multiple relations we
need to remember all buffers of each truncated relations, which is up
to (sizeof(int) * NBuffers) in total.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
