On 11.04.20 21:47, Corey Huinker wrote:


    Term 'relation': A sequence is internally a table with one row -
    right?
    Shall we extend the list of concrete relations by 'sequence'? Or
    is this
    not necessary because 'table' is already there?


I wrote one for sequence, it was a bit math-y for Alvaro's taste, so we're going to try again.

This seems to be a misunderstanding. My question was whether we shall extend the definition of Relation to: "... Tables, views, foreign tables, materialized views, indexes, and *sequences* are all relations."

Kind regards, Jürgen

Reply via email to