Petr Jelinek <p...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > AFAIK gcov can't handle multiple instances of same process being started > as it just overwrites the coverage files. So for TAP test it will report > bogus info (as in some code that's executed will look as not executed).
Hm, really? I routinely run "make check" (ie, parallel regression
tests) under coverage, and I get results that seem sane. If I were
losing large chunks of the data, I think I'd have noticed.
regards, tom lane
