I took a look at this proposal, and while I see the value of being
able to do something like this, it seems pretty short-sighted and
non-orthogonal as it stands. We've already got \gx, which is a wart,
and now this patch wants to add \gfmt which is a different wart of the
same ilk. What happens if you want to combine them? Plus we already
had David complaining upthread that he'd like to be able to select
CSV-format suboptions; and now here comes Erik wondering about the
same thing.
It seems to me that this line of development is going to end in a whole
flotilla of \g-something commands that aren't composable and never quite
satisfy the next use-case to come down the pike, so we keep on needing
even more of them.
So I think we really need a way to be able to specify multiple different
\pset subcommands that apply just for the duration of one \g command.
Pavel dismissed that upthread as being too hard, but I think we'd better
try harder.
Plan A:
Consider some syntax along the lines of
\gpset (pset-option-name [pset-option-value]) ... filename
or if you don't like parentheses, choose some other punctuation to wrap
the \pset options in. I initially thought of square brackets, but I'm
afraid they might be just too darn confusing to document --- how could
you make them distinct from metasyntax square brackets, especially in
plain-ASCII docs? Also it'd have to be punctuation that's unlikely to
start a file name --- but parens are already reserved in most shells.
Plan B:
Another idea is to break the operation into multiple backslash commands,
where the initial ones set up state that doesn't do anything until the
output command comes along:
\tpset [ pset-option-name [ pset-option-value ] ]
Sets a "temporary" pset option, which will have effect in the
next \gpset command; or with no parameters, shows the current set
of temporary options
\gpset filename
Execute SQL command and output to filename (or pipe), using the
pset option set defined by preceding \tpset commands, and reverting
that option set to all-defaults afterward.
Probably we could think of better terminology than "temporary"
and a better command name than "\tpset", but you get the gist.
Admittedly, "\tpset format csv \gpset filename" is a bit more
verbose than the current proposal of "\gfmt csv filename"
... but we'd have solved the problem once and for all, even
for pset options we've not invented yet.
Plan C:
Probably there are other ways to get there; these are just the
first ideas that came to me.
regards, tom lane
