On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:22:25AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 at 13:18, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rash...@gmail.com> wrote:
OK, I've pushed that with your recommendation for that function name.
Does this now complete everything that you wanted to do for functional
dependency stats for PG13? Re-reading the thread, I couldn't see
anything else that needed looking at. If that's the case, the CF entry
can be closed.
Yes. There were two improvements proposed, we've committed one of them
(the IN/ANY operator handling) and the other (containment) needs more
discussion. So I think it's OK to mark this either as committed or maybe
returned with feedback.
regards
--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
