On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:38:33PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > Greetings, > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 18:36 Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 12:34:52PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > > * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > This is where I feel like I'm trying to make decisions in a vacuum. If > > > we had a few more people weighing in on the thread on this point, I'd > > > be happy to go with whatever the consensus was. If most people think > > > having both --no-manifest (suppressing the manifest completely) and > > > --manifest-checksums=none (suppressing only the checksums) is useless > > > and confusing, then sure, let's rip the latter one out. If most people > > > like the flexibility, let's keep it: it's already implemented and > > > tested. But I hate to base the decision on what one or two people > > > think. > > > > I'm frustrated at the lack of involvement from others also. > > Well, the topic of backup manifests feels like it has generated a lot of > bickering emails, and people don't want to spend their time dealing with > that. > > > I’d like to not also. I suppose it’s just an area that I’m particularly > concerned with that allows me to overcome that. Backups are important to me.
The big question is whether the discussion _needs_ to be that way. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
