On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 11:32:25PM +0100, Jürgen Purtz wrote: > > > + <glossterm>Archiver</glossterm> > > Can you change that to archiver process ? > > I prefer the short term without the addition of 'process' - concerning > 'Archiver' as well as the other cases. But I'm not an native English > speaker.
I didn't like it due to lack of context. What about "wal archiver" ? It occured to me when I read this. https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20200327.163007.128069746774242774.horikyota.ntt%40gmail.com -- Justin
