Tom Lane-2 wrote > Fujii Masao < > masao.fujii@.nttdata
> > writes: >> Does anyone object to this patch? I'm thinking to commit it separetely >> at first before committing the planning_counter_in_pg_stat_statements >> patch. > > I took a quick look through v9-0001-Pass-query-string-to-the-planner.patch > and it's fine by me. It also matches up with something I've wanted to > do for awhile, which is to make the query string available during > planning and execution so that we can produce error cursors for > run-time errors, when relevant. > > [...] > > regards, tom lane Great ! Good news ;o) Regards PAscal -- Sent from: https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html
