On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 07:17, Justin Pryzby <pry...@telsasoft.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 10:04:57AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > > Does that address your comment ? > > I hope so.
Thank you for updating the patch. I'm concerned a bit about overhead of frequently updating and reverting the callback arguments in lazy_vacuum_page(). We call that function every time when we vacuum a page, but if the table has an index, we actually don't need to update the callback arguments in that function. But I hope it's negligible since all operation will be performed on memory. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
