Wow, this thread started in 2015. :-O
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 00:05:24 +0200 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 12:01:27PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 08:46:47PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:29:19PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > > > The attached is back-patches from 9.5 through master. > > > > Thanks. I've made some edits. I'll plan to push the attached patches on > > Friday or Saturday. > > Pushed, after adding a missing "break" to gist_identify() and tweaking two > more comments. However, a diverse minority of buildfarm members are failing > like this, in most branches: > > Mar 21 13:16:37 # Failed test 'wal_level = minimal, SET TABLESPACE, hint > bit' > Mar 21 13:16:37 # at t/018_wal_optimize.pl line 231. > Mar 21 13:16:37 # got: '1' > Mar 21 13:16:37 # expected: '2' > Mar 21 13:16:46 # Looks like you failed 1 test of 34. > Mar 21 13:16:46 [13:16:46] t/018_wal_optimize.pl ................ > -- > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=crake&dt=2020-03-21%2016%3A52%3A05 > > Since I run two of the failing animals, I expect to reproduce this soon. > > fairywren failed differently on 9.5; I have not yet studied it: > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=fairywren&dt=2020-03-21%2018%3A01%3A10 > > > > It lacks a part of TAP infrastructure nowadays we have, but I > > > want to have the test (and it actually found a bug I made during this > > > work). So I added a patch to back-patch TestLib.pm, PostgresNode.pm > > > and RecursiveCopy.pm along with 018_wal_optimize.pl. > > > (0004-Add-TAP-test-for-WAL-skipping-feature.patch) > > > > That is a good idea. Rather than make it specific to this test, I would > > like > > to back-patch all applicable test files from 9.6 src/test/recovery. I'll > > plan > > to push that one part on Thursday. > > That push did not cause failures. > > -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +