Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Ah, I hadn't checked -- I was taking the function and struct names at > face value, but it turns out that they're lies as well -- parse_real, > relopt_real all parsing/storing doubles *is* confusing.
Yeah, that's certainly true. I wonder if we could rename them without causing a lot of pain for extensions? regards, tom lane