Hi, On 2020-03-13 19:10:00 -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 02:38:51PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote: > > > |One disadvantage of decreasing vacuum_freeze_min_age is that it might > > > cause > > > |VACUUM to do useless work: freezing a row version is a waste of time if > > > the row > > > |is modified soon thereafter (causing it to acquire a new XID). So the > > > setting > > > |should be large enough that rows are not frozen until they are unlikely > > > to > > > |change any more. > > > > I think the overhead here might be a bit overstated. Once a page is > > Could you clarify if you mean the language in docs in general or specifically > in the context of this patch ?
In the docs. Greetings, Andres Freund
