On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 02:49:14PM +0530, Kuntal Ghosh wrote:
> Hello Hackers,
>
> While working on some issue in logical decoding, I found some
> inconsistencies in the comment for defining max_cached_tuplebufs in
> reorderbuffer.c. It only exists till PG10 because after that the
> definition got removed by the generational memory allocator patch. The
> variable is defined as follows in reorderbuffer.c:
> static const Size max_cached_tuplebufs = 4096 * 2; /* ~8MB */
>
> And it gets compared with rb->nr_cached_tuplebufs in
> ReorderBufferReturnTupleBuf as follows:
> if (tuple->alloc_tuple_size == MaxHeapTupleSize &&
> rb->nr_cached_tuplebufs < max_cached_tuplebufs)
>
> {
> rb->nr_cached_tuplebufs++;
> }
>
> So, what this variable actually tracks is 4096 * 2 times
> MaxHeapTupleSize amount of memory which is approximately 64MB. I've
> attached a patch to modify the comment.
>
> But, I'm not sure whether the intention was to keep 8MB cache only. In
> that case, I can come up with another patch.
Yes, I see you are correct, since each tuplebuf is MaxHeapTupleSize.
Patch applied from PG 9.5 to PG 10. Thanks.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
