On 2020-03-10 12:27:25 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > That's true, but I have the same concern with Tom. The archive bacame > too-tightly linked with other processes than actual relation.
What's the problem here? We have a number of helper processes (checkpointer, bgwriter) that are attached to shared memory, and it's not a problem. > We may need the second static shared memory segment apart from the > current one. That seems absurd to me. Solving a non-problem by introducing complex new infrastructure.
