On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:59 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > =?UTF-8?Q?Fabr=C3=ADzio_de_Royes_Mello?= <fabriziome...@gmail.com> writes: > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 12:27 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > >> Which, TBH, makes me wonder about the validity of the original complaint > >> in this thread. I don't mind delaying ET restore as long as we feasibly > >> can; but if you have an ET that is going to misbehave during restore, > >> you are in for pain, and it's hard to consider that that pain isn't > >> self-inflicted. > > > The proposed patch solve the original complain. I was just trying to > > understand completely what you pointed out before and I agree with you. > > Thanks for the clear explanation. > > OK, thanks for confirming that this solves your issue in practice. > > > About the patch LGTM and IMHO we should back-patch it to all supported > > versions. > > Done. >
Great, thanks! -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Timbira - http://www.timbira.com.br/ PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento