On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:00:54 +0300 Sergei Kornilov <s...@zsrv.org> wrote:
> Hello > > > I want to start this discussion because this is related to the patch > > (propoesd at the thread [1]) that I'm reviewing. It does that partially, > > i.e., prefers the promotion only when the pause is requested by > > recovery_target_action=pause. But I think that it's reasonable and > > more consistent to do that whether whichever the pause is requested > > by pg_wal_replay_pause() or recovery_target_action. > > +1. +1 And pg_wal_replay_pause () should probably raise an error explaining the standby ignores the pause because of ongoing promotion.
