On 2020-Mar-04, Alexander Korotkov wrote: > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 1:33 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: > > I think I would like this feature to be in, but I'm not sure that the > > shape is final yet. My points: > > > > a) I don't see any use for \dA as presented; I think the \dA+ output is > > useful. Therefore my preference would be that \dA presents what the > > latest patch has as \dA+. I think we should leave \dA+ unimplemented > > for now; maybe we can use some use for it later on. > > Neither \dA or \dA+ are introduced or affected by this patch. If we > like to change their behavior, we should probably do this separately > from this patch.
Doh, you're right, sorry. Looking only at the regress/expected/psql.out changes, I'm satisfied with this version of the patch. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
