> On 26 Feb 2020, at 15:13, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote: > On pgsql-hackers we only want to find a future-proof way to "package > existing objects into an extension".
What is the longterm goal of PostGIS, to use this as a stepping stone to reach a point where no unpackaged extensions exist; or find a way to continue with the current setup except with syntax that isn't going away? > If the syntax > `CREATE EXTENSION <extname> FROM UNPACKAGED` > has gone, would it be ok for just: > `CREATE EXTENSION <extname>` > to intercept unpackaged objects and package them ? Overloading the same syntax for creating packaged as well as unpackaged extensions sounds like the wrong path to go down. cheers ./daniel
