On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:10:11AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> OK, added in new patch.

Thanks, that looks good.

> The frontends do neither right now, or at least the error handling is very
> inconsistent and inscrutable.  It would be possible in theory to add a retry
> option, but that would be a very different patch, and given what we have
> learned about fsync(), it probably wouldn't be widely useful.

Perhaps.  Let's have this discussion later if there are drawbacks
about changing things the way your patch does.  If we don't do that,
we'll never know about it either and this patch makes things safer.
--
Michael

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to