On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 6:56 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> As mentioned in https://postgr.es/m/20191231194759.GA24692@alvherre.pgsql
> I propose to add a new column to pg_trigger, which allows us to remove a
> pg_depend scan when cloning triggers when adding/attaching partitions.
> (It's not that I think the scan is a performance problem, but rather
> than notionally we try not to depend on pg_depend contents for this kind
> of semantic derivation.)
@@ -16541,7 +16493,7 @@ CloneRowTriggersToPartition(Relation parent,
Relation partition)
*
* However, if our parent is a partitioned relation, there might be
This is existing text, but should really be:
However, if our parent is a *partition* itself, there might be
(Sorry, I forgot to report this when the bug-fix went in couple months ago.)
* internal triggers that need cloning. In that case, we must skip
- * clone it if the trigger on parent depends on another trigger.
+ * cloning it if the trigger on parent depends on another trigger.
2nd sentence seems unclear to me. Does the following say what needs
to be said here:
* However, if our parent is a partition itself, there might be
* internal triggers that need cloning. For example, triggers on the
* parent that were in turn cloned from its own parent are marked
* internal, which too must be cloned to the partition.
Thanks,
Amit
