On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 03:22:12PM +0000, Alexey Bashtanov wrote:
Hello,

It took me a while to figure out what those names mean.  "unfetched",
as you call it on the code, may be more descriptive than "avoided" for
the new label.  However I think the other two are more confusing.  It
may be a good idea to change them together with this.
It'll be sad if this patch is forgotten only because of the words choice.
I've changed it all to "unfetched" for at least not to call the same thing differently in the code and in the output, and also rebased it and fit in 80 lines width limit.


I kinda suspect one of the ressons why this got so little attention is
that it was never added to any CF.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


Reply via email to