On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 01:00:00PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote: > Hello, > > Here's a rebase of a refactoring patch that got lost behind a filing > cabinet on another thread even though there seemed to be some > agreement that we probably want something like this[1]. It introduces > a new type SegmentNumber, instead of using BlockNumber to represent > segment numbers.
+1, and looks good to me!
