On 2020-Feb-05, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > The second item genereated another thread a little after this thread. > Everything was handled on this other thread. Ultimately, I rejected > the enhancement on the grounds that it wasn't safe on standbys in the > face of concurrent splits and deletions [1]. > > I believe that all of the items discussed on this thread have been > resolved. Did I miss a CF entry or something?
Nah. I just had one of the messages flagged in my inbox, and I wasn't sure what had happened since the other thread was not referenced in this one. I wasn't looking at any CF entries. Thanks for the explanation, -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
