Hi, On 2020-02-06 05:12:11 +0000, tsunakawa.ta...@fujitsu.com wrote: > I think per-table reloption is necessary as well as or instead of GUC, > because the need for caching depends on the table (see below for Oracle's > manual.)
I'm inclined to not do that initially. It's going to be controversial enough to add the GUCs. > I'm afraid it would be confusing for a user-settable parameter to have > different units (percent and size). I think just the positive > percentage would suffice. IDK, I feel like there's good reasons to use either. But I'd gladly take just percent if that's the general concensus, rather than not getting the improvement at all. Greetings, Andres Freund
