On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 18:25 Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:15 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi > <horikyota....@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2020年2月5日(水) 17:54 Amit Langote <amitlangot...@gmail.com>: > >> > >> > I'm not sure, but doesn't that mean "waiting for a checkpoint to > >> > start"? Sorry in advance if that is not the case. > >> > >> No, I really meant "to finish". As Sawada-san said upthread, we > >> should really use text that describes the activity that usually takes > >> long. While it takes takes only a moment to actually start the > >> checkpoint, it might take long for it to finish. > > > > I meant that the wording might sound as if it implies "to start", but.. > > Ah, I misunderstood then, sorry. > > So, maybe you're saying that "waiting for checkpoint" is ambiguous and > most people will assume it means "...to start". As for me, I assume > it ends with "...to finish". > > >> As Fujii-san says > >> though we don't need the noise words "to finish". > > > > Understood, sorry for my noise. > > Actually, that's an important point to consider and we should strive > to use words that are unambiguous. Last two messages weren’t sent to the list. Thanks, Amit >
