Peter Geoghegan <p...@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:09 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> No. No. Just NO. (A) that's overly complex for developers to use,
>> and (B) you have far too much faith in the debugger producing something
>> useful. (My experience is that it'll fail to render function pointers
>> legibly on an awful lot of platforms.) Plus, you won't actually save
>> any space by removing both of those fields.
> FWIW, I noticed that GDB becomes much better at this when you add "set
> print symbol on" to your .gdbinit dot file about a year ago.
Interesting. But I bet there are platform and version dependencies
in the mix, too. I'd still not wish to rely on this for debugging.
regards, tom lane
