On 1/23/20 11:05 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 12:49 PM Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Another idea is to use base64 for all non-ASCII file names, so we don't
>> need to check if the file name is valid UTF8 before outputting --- we
>> just need to check for non-ASCII, which is much easier.
>
> I think that we have the infrastructure available to check in a
> convenient way whether it's valid as UTF-8, so this might not be
> necessary, but I will look into it further unless there is a consensus
> to go another direction entirely.
>
>> Another
>> problem, though, is how do you _flag_ file names as being
>> base64-encoded?  Use another JSON field to specify that?
>
> Alvaro's proposed solution in the message to which you replied was to
> call the field either 'path' or 'path_base64' depending on whether
> base-64 escaping was used. That seems better to me than having a field
> called 'path' and a separate field called 'is_path_base64' or
> whatever.

+1. I'm not excited about this solution but don't have a better idea.

It might be nice to have a strict mode where non-ASCII/UTF8 characters will error instead, but that can be added on later.

Regards,
--
-David
da...@pgmasters.net


Reply via email to