On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote: > Yeah, you're right returning them with feedback seems more appropriate, > given the long inactivity. Plus, the CF app apparently does not allow > moving WoA patches to the next CF anyway.
FWIW, I tend to take a base of two weeks as a sensible period of time as that's half the CF period when I do the classification job. > Those are the patches that have been set as WoA before this CF, and have > not been updated since. It's quite possible the state is stale for some > of those patches, although I've tried to check if there were any > messages on the list. You need to be careful about bug fixes, as these are things that we don't want to lose track of. Another thing that I noticed in the past is that some patches are registered as bug fixes, but they actually implement a new feature. So there can be tricky cases. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
