On 2020/01/18 12:48, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 07:36:51PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 1:47 PM Michael Paquier <mich...@paquier.xyz> wrote:
Thanks.  I have few tweaks to propose to the docs.

+        raise a PANIC-level error, aborting the recovery. Setting
Instead of "PANIC-level error", I would just use "PANIC error", and

I have no strong opinion about this, but I used "PANIC-level error"
because the description for data_sync_retry has already used it.

Okay.  Fine with what you think is good.

instead of "aborting the recovery" just "crashing the server".

PANIC implies server crash, so IMO "crashing the server" is
a bit redundant, and "aborting the recovery" is better because
"continue the recovery" is used later.

Okay.  I see your point here.

So, what about

---------------
causes the system to ignore invalid page references in WAL records
(but still report a warning), and continue the recovery.
---------------

And that sounds good to me.  Switching the patch as ready for
committer.

Thanks! Committed!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters


Reply via email to