Hi, Yes, but the comment it does not clarify that the return of the variable "const_one" is intentional, instead of "const_zero". Anybody with reads the source, can think which is a copy and paste mistake.
regards Ranier Vilela Em dom., 19 de jan. de 2020 às 21:22, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> escreveu: > Ranier Vilela <ranier...@gmail.com> writes: > > Possible copy and past error, found in numeric.c. > > I believe I believe that the author's intention was to return const_zero. > > Did you read the comment just above there? > > regards, tom lane >
