Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I didn't review in detail, but it seems good to me. I especially liked > getting rid of the ProcessedConstraint code, and the additional test > cases.
Thanks for looking!
Yeah, all those test cases expose situations where we misbehave
today :-(. I wish this were small enough to be back-patchable,
but it's not feasible.
regards, tom lane
