On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 8:18 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:16 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > > * The seeming bug in v10 suggests that we aren't testing large enough > > logical-decoding cases, or at least aren't noticing leaks in that > > area. I'm not sure what a good design is for testing that. I'm not > > thrilled with just using a larger (and slower) test case, but it's > > not clear to me how else to attack it. > > > > It is not clear to me either at this stage, but I think we can decide > that after chasing the issue in v10. My current plan is to revert > this test and make a note of the memory leak problem found (probably > track in Older Bugs section of PostgreSQL 12 Open Items). >
Pushed the revert and added an open item in the 'Older Bugs' section of PostgreSQL 12 Open Items [1]. [1] - https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_12_Open_Items -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
